VerfassungsgeschichteVerfassungsvergleichVerfassungsrechtRechtsphilosophie
ÜbersichtWho-is-WhoBundesgerichtBundesverfassungsgerichtVolltextsuche...

Informationen zum Dokument  EGMR 23459/03 - Bayatyan v. Armenia  Materielle Begründung

1. Bearbeitung

2. Abruf & Rang

3. Zitiert durch:

4. Zitiert selbst:

5. Besprechungen:

6. Zitiert in Literatur:

    [nicht verfügbar]
7. Markierte Gliederung:

I. The Circumstances of the case
A. Background to the case
B. Criminal proceedings against the applicant
C. The applicant's arrest and trial
II. Relevant Domestic Law
A. The Constitution of Armenia of 1995 (prior to the amendments introduced in 2005)
B. The Criminal Code of 1961 (no longer in force since 1 August 2003)
C. The Military Liability Act (in force since 16 October 1998)
D. The Freedom of Conscience and Religious Organisations Act (in force since 6 July 1991)
E. The Alternative Service Act (passed on 17 December 2003 and entered into force on 1 July 2004)
III. Comparative Law
IV. Relevant international documents and practice
A. European documents
1. The Council of Europe ...
(a) Armenia specific documents ...
(b) General documents ...
(i) The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe ...
(ii) The Committee of Ministers ...
2. The European Union ...
(a) The European Parliament ...
(b) The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union ...
B. Other international documents and practice
1. The United Nations ...
(a) The United Nations Commission on Human Rights ...
(b) The ICCPR and the practice of the United Nations Human Rights ...
(c) The Working Group on Arbitrary Detention ...
2. Inter-American system of human rights protection ...
3. The Ibero-American Convention on Young People's Rights ...
4. The Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) ...
I. Alleged Violation of Article 9 of the Convention
A. The Chamber judgment
B. The parties' submissions
1. The applicant ...
(a) Applicability of Article 9 ...
(b) Compliance with Article 9 ...
2. The Government ...
(a) Applicability of Article 9 ...
(b) Compliance with Article 9 ...
3. Third-party interveners ...
(a) Joint observations of Amnesty International, Conscience and P ...
(b) The European Association of Jehovah's Christian Witnesses ...
C. The Court's assessment
1. Applicability of Article 9 ...
(a) Recapitulation of the relevant case-law ...
(b) Whether there is a need for a change of the case-law ...
2. Compliance with Article 9 ...
(a) Whether there was an interference ...
(b) Whether the interference was justified ...
(i) Prescribed by law ...
(ii) Legitimate aim ...
(iii) Necessary in a democratic society ...
II. Application of Article 41 of the Convention
A. Damage
B. Costs and expenses
C. Default interest

Bearbeitung, zuletzt am 21.11.2024, durch: Michelle Ammann, A. Tschentscher
© 1994-2024 Das Fallrecht (DFR).