1. Bearbeitung Texterfassung:  Jana Schmid Formatierung:  Jana Schmid Revision:  A. Tschentscher 2. Abruf & Rang Abrufen:  RTF-Version RTF mit Seiten RTF mit Linien Druckversion Druck mit Seiten Rspr.:   0% (128) Lit.:   0% (92) Suche:   0% (516) Rang:   0% (656) 3. Zitiert durch: 4. Zitiert selbst: 5. Besprechungen:

6. Zitiert in Literatur: [nicht verfügbar] 7. Markierte Gliederung: I. The Circumstances of the Case II. Relevant Domestic Law A. Federal Asylum Act of 26 June 1998, as in force at the relevant time B. Asylum Ordinance 1 of 11 August 1999 concerning procedure (Asylum Ordinance 1, OA 1), as in force at the relevant time C. Federal Court Act of 17 June 2005 D. Federal Administrative Court Act of 17 June 2005 E. Relevant case-law of the Federal Administrative Court III. Relevant European Union Law IV. The Italian Context A. Asylum Procedure B. Legal framework and organisation of the reception system for asylum seekers C. Recommendations of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees on important aspects of refugee protection in Italy (July 2013) D. Report by Nils Muiznieks, Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe, published on 18 September 2012, following his visit to Italy from 3 to 6 July 2012 (CommDH(2012)26) E. Information provided by the International Organization for Migration in a press briefing note of 28 January 2014 V. Relevant Comparative Law A. Relevant German Case-Law B. Relevant case-law of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom I. Alleged Violation of Article 3 of the Convention A. The parties' submissions 1. The applicants ... (a) Slowness of the identification procedure ... (b) Capacity of the reception facilities ... (c) Living conditions in the available facilities ... 2. The Government ... (a) Slowness of the identification procedure ... (b) Capacity of the reception facilities ... (c) Living conditions in the available facilities ...  ... (a) Slowness of the identification procedure ... (b) Capacity of the reception facilities ... (c) Living conditions in the available facilities ... B. The Court's assessment 1. Switzerland's responsibility under the Convention ... 2. Admissibility ... 3. Merits ... (a) Recapitulation of general principles ... (b) Application of these principles to the present case ... (i) Overall situation with regard to the reception arrangements f ... alpha) Slowness of the identification procedure ... beta) Capacity of the reception facilities ... gamma) Reception conditions in the available facilities ... (ii) The applicants' individual situation ... II. Alleged Violation of Article 3 of the Convention Taken in Conjunction with Article 3 III. Application of Art 41 of the Convention A. Damage B. Costs and expenses C. Default interest