VerfassungsgeschichteVerfassungsvergleichVerfassungsrechtRechtsphilosophie
ÜbersichtWho-is-WhoBundesgerichtBundesverfassungsgerichtVolltextsuche...

Informationen zum Dokument  EGMR 30696/09 - M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece  Materielle Begründung

1. Bearbeitung

2. Abruf & Rang

3. Zitiert durch:

4. Zitiert selbst:

5. Besprechungen:

6. Zitiert in Literatur:

    [nicht verfügbar]
7. Markierte Gliederung:

I. The Circumstances of the Case
A. Entry into the European Union
B. Asylum procedure and expulsion procedure in Belgium
C. Request for interim measures against Belgium
D. Indication of interim measures against Greece
E. Subsequent events
II. Relevant International and European Law
A. The 1951 Geneva Convention relating to the Status of Refugees
B. Community law
1. The Treaty on European Union (as amended by the Treaty of Lisb ...
2. The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (as amende ...
3. The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union ...
4. The "Dublin" asylum system ...
(a) The Dublin Regulation and the Eurodac Regulation ...
(b) The European Union's directives on asylum matters ...
C. Relevant texts of the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights
III. Relevant Law and Practice in Greece
A. The conditions of reception of asylum seekers
1. Residence ...
2. Detention ...
B. The asylum procedure
1. Applicable provisions ...
(a) Access to the procedure ...
(b) Examination of the application for asylum at first instance ...
(c) Appeals against negative decisions ...
(d) Protection against refoulement ...
(e) Authorisation to stay for humanitarian reasons and subsidiary ...
(f) Ongoing reforms in the asylum procedure ...
2. Statistical data on asylum in Greece ...
IV. Relevant Law and Practice in Belgium
A. The Aliens Office
B. The Aliens Appeals Board
1. Stay of execution under the extremely urgent procedure ...
2. Examination of the merits ...
3. Case-law of the Aliens Appeals Board in "Dublin" cases ...
C. The Conseil d'Etat
D. The courts and tribunals
V. International Documents describing  the Conditions of Detention and Reception of Asylum seekers and also the Asylum Procedure in Greece
A. Reports published since 2006
B. Conditions of detention
C. Living conditions
D. The asylum procedure
1. Access to the asylum procedure ...
2. Procedure for examining applications for asylum ...
3. Remedies ...
4. Risk of refoulement ...
5. Letter of the UNHCR of 2 April 2009 ...
VI. International Documents describing the situation in Afghanistan
I. Alleged Violation of Article 3 of the Convention by Greece because of the Conditions of the Applicant's detention
A. The parties' submissions
1. The applicant ...
2. The Greek Government ...
B. Observations of the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, intervening as third parties
C. The Court's assessment
1. Admissibility ...
2. Merits ...
(a) Recapitulation of general principles ...
(b) Application in the present case ...
II. Alleged Violation of Article 3 of the Convention by Greece because of the Applicant's living conditions
A. The parties' submissions
1. The applicant ...
2. The Greek Government ...
B. Observations of the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, the Aire Centre and Amnesty International, intervening as third parties
C. The Court's assessment
1. Admissibility ...
2. Merits ...
III. Alleged Violation by Greece of Article 13 taken in Conjunction with Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention because of the shortcomings in the Asylum procedure
A. The parties' submissions
1. The applicant ...
2. The Greek Government ...
B. Observations of the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, the Aire Centre, Amnesty International and the Greek Helsinki Monitor, intervening as third parties
C. The Court's assessment
1. Admissibility ...
2. Merits ...
(a) Recapitulation of general principles ...
(b) Application in the present case ...
(c) Conclusion ...
IV. Alleged Violation of Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention by Belgium for Exposing the Applicant to the risks arising from the Deficiencies in the Asylum procedure in Greece
A. The parties' submissions
1. The applicant ...
2. The Belgian Government ...
B. Observations of the Governments of the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, and of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, the Aire Centre and Amnesty International and the Greek Helsinki Monitor, intervening as third parties
C. The Court's assessment
1. Admissibility ...
2. The responsibility of Belgium under the Convention ...
3. Merits of the complaints under Articles 2 and 3 of the Convent ...
(a) The T.I. and K.R.S. decisions ...
(b) Application of these principles to the present case ...
(c) Conclusion ...
V. Alleged Violation of Article 3 of the Convention by Belgium for exposing the Applicant to Conditions of Detention and living conditions contrary to Article 3
VI. Alleged Violation by Belgium of Article 13 taken in conjunction with Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention because of the lack of an effective remedy against the expulsion order
A. The parties' submissions
1. The applicant ...
2. The Belgian Government ...
VII. Application of Articles 46 and 41 of the Convention
A. Article 46 of the Convention
B. Article 41 de la Convention
1. Non-pecuniary damage ...
(a) In respect of Greece ...
(b) In respect of Belgium ...
2. Costs and expenses ...
(a) In respect of Greece ...
(b) In respect of Belgium ...
(c) In respect of Belgium and Greece ...
(d) Default interest ...

Bearbeitung, zuletzt am 24.11.2024, durch: Michelle Ammann, A. Tschentscher
© 1994-2024 Das Fallrecht (DFR).