1. Bearbeitung
2. Abruf & Rang
3. Zitiert durch:
4. Zitiert selbst:
5. Besprechungen:
|
6. Zitiert in Literatur:
7. Markierte Gliederung:
I. The Circumstances of the Case
A. The applicants
B. Proceedings in the Constitutional Court
1. Principal State Counsel's submissions ...
2. The applicants' defence ...
3. The parties' final submissions ...
4. The Constitutional Court's judgments ...
II. Relevant Domestic Law
A. The Constitution
B. Law no. 2820 on the regulation of political parties
C. Article 163 of the Criminal Code, repealed on 12 April 1991
I. Alleged Violation of Article 11 of the Convention
A. Whether there was an interference
B. Whether the interference was justified
1. "Prescribed by law" ...
(a) Arguments of the parties ...
(i) The applicants ...
(ii) The Government ...
(b) The Court's assessment ...
2. Legitimate aim ...
3. "Necessary in a democratic society" ...
(a) Arguments of the parties ...
(i) The applicants ...
(ii) The Government ...
(b) The Court's assessment ...
(i) General principles ...
alpha) Democracy and political parties in the Convention system ...
beta) Democracy and religion in the Convention system ...
gamma) The possibility of imposing restrictions, and rigorous Eur ...
delta) Imputability to a political party of the acts and speeches ...
epsilon) The appropriate timing for dissolution ...
zeta) Overall examination ...
(ii) Application of the above principles to the present case ...
alpha) Pressing social need ...
The appropriate timing for dissolution ...
Imputability to Refah of the acts and speeches of its members ...
The main grounds for dissolution cited by the Constitutional Cour ...
...
beta) Proportionality of the measure complained of ...
4. The Court's conclusion regarding Article 11 of the Convention ...
II. Alleged Violation of Articles 9, 10, 14, 17 and 18 of the Convention
III. Alleged Violation of Articles 1 and 3 of Protocol No. 1
|