1. Bearbeitung Texterfassung:  Michelle Ammann Formatierung:  Michelle Ammann Revision:  A. Tschentscher 2. Abruf & Rang Abrufen:  RTF-Version RTF mit Seiten RTF mit Linien Druckversion Druck mit Seiten Rspr.:   0% (128) Lit.:   0% (92) Suche:   27% (516) Rang:   60% (656) 3. Zitiert durch: 4. Zitiert selbst: 5. Besprechungen:

6. Zitiert in Literatur: [nicht verfügbar] 7. Markierte Gliederung: I. The Circumstances of the Case A. The applicant's arrest and transfer to Turkey B. Police custody on the island of Imrali C. Appearance before a judge and pre-trial detention D. Contact with the outside world during the judicial investigation and conditions at Imrali Prison E. The trial at the National Security Court F. The appeal on points of law G. Commutation of the death penalty to life imprisonment II. Relevant Domestic and International Law and Practice A. Provisions on National Security Courts B. Article 125 of the Turkish Criminal Code C. Review of the lawfulness of detention D. The Council of Europe and the death penalty E. Other international developments concerning the death penalty I. Alleged Violation of Article 5 of the Convention A. Article 5 § 4 of the Convention 1. The applicant's submissions ... 2. The Government's submissions ... 3. The Court's assessment ... B. Article 5 § 1 of the Convention 1. The applicant's submissions ... 2. The Government's submissions ... 3. The Court's assessment ... (a) General principles ... (b) Application of the principles to the present case ... (i) Whether the arrest complied with Turkish law ... (ii) Interception by Kenyan agents ... C. Article 5 § 3 of the Convention 1. The applicant's submissions ... 2. The Government's submissions ... 3. The Court's assessment ... II. Alleged Violation of Article 6 of the Convention A. Whether the Ankara National Security Court, which convicted the applicant, was independent and impartial 1. The applicant's submissions ... 2. The Government's submissions ... 3. The Court's assessment ... B. Whether the proceedings in the National Security Court were fair 1. The applicant's submissions ... 2. The Government's submissions ... 3. The Court's assessment ... (a) Legal assistance ... (i) The applicant's lack of access to a lawyer while in police cu ... (ii) Consultation with his lawyers out of the hearing of third p ... (iii) Number and length of the visits by the applicant's lawyers ... (b) The applicant's access to the case file ... (c) Access by the applicant's lawyers to the court file ... (d) The Court's conclusion regarding the fairness of the trial ... III. Death Penalty: Alleged Violation of Articles 2, 3 and 14 of the Convention A. Implementation of the death penalty B. Imposition of the death penalty 1. The parties' submissions ... (a) The applicant ... (b) The Government ... 2. The Court's assessment ... (a) Legal significance of the practice of the Contracting States  ... (b) Unfair proceedings and the death penalty ... (i) Under Article 2 ... (ii) Under Article 3 ... (iii) Application of these principles to the present case ... IV. Alleged Violation of Article 3 of the Convention: Conditions of Detention A. Conditions in which the applicant was transferred from Kenya to Turkey 1. The applicant's submissions ... 2. The Government's submissions ... 3. The Court's assessment ... (a) General principles ... (b) Application of the above principles to the instant case ... B. Conditions of detention on the island of mral 1. The applicant's submissions ... 2. The Government's submissions ... 3. The Court's assessment ... V. Alleged Violation of Article 34 of the Convention VI. Other Complaints VII. Articles 46 and 41 of the Convention A. Article 46 of the Convention B. Article 41 of the Convention 1. Damage ... 2. Costs and expenses ... 3. Default interest ...